Renovare Summary
Home Up Renovare Summary Renovare Analysis

 

Home
Up

RENOVARE, THE EMERGENT CHURCH, AND ECUMENICALISM

by Ike Sweesy, 2010

note:  I have gone to great pains on other pages to emphasize that I have true Christian brothers with whom I fellowship who are 'cultural' Roman Catholics, or 'practicing' Liberals or even have some Emergent 'leanings'.  There are many true Christians who have identified with these, and my being against something is not saying that everything about it is wrong or error.  But I'm also saying that these are dangerous, and that Christians should take heed to the dangers that are identifiable by investigation and comparison with the truths of Scripture. Much of the Emergent Church especially tends to deny or minimize identifiable truth.   Although this is a very big generalization for this summary, I have grouped Ecumenicalism with Renovare and the Emergent Church because these, in the final analysis, have largely abandoned or ignored the distinctives of the Apostolic, Reformed faith.

Summary:   Renovare, the Emergent Church, and Ecumenicalism are not ‘evangelical’ in the historical meaning of the word.  Although these are not 'monolithic' exhibiting all of the same characteristics, but each de-emphasizes the distinctives of Apostolic & Reformed doctrine & practice (but not meaning ‘tradition’ or ‘form’, but rather biblical substance); and substitutes “experience”, “spirituality” and “community” for biblical doctrine, godliness, and Christian unity.   A danger is that many of these re-define many formerly 'evangelical' words, and give them new meaning and application but without broadcasting those new definitions or inclusions.  Two prime examples are "Christian" and "Gospel", which are no longer exclusively 'evangelical' (or Apostolic/Reformed) but now have been expanded to be more 'inclusive' and 'communal'.  Likewise, Christian doctrine itself has little importance and does not define these new 'communities of faith'.  That means that they have no grounding in anything solid.  Indeed, many even minimize the absolute authority of the scriptures themselves.   That's fine, but don't use the words "Christian" or "Gospel" or "Evangelical".  That's false advertising.

“Evangelical” used to refer to those who proclaimed the ‘good news’ of faith in the crucified Christ (alone) for the forgiveness of sins (Substitutionary atonement), and being ‘born again’ as a result of that Faith.  To be “Evangelical” was to have a scriptural and missionary focus as detailed in ‘Apostolic’ and ‘Reformed’ doctrine and practice.  Those people who were not ‘born again’ were not considered to be “Christian”, and were to be ‘Evangelized” to the ‘good news’.  To be identified as “Evangelical” was to be distinct from “Liberal Theology”, from “Neo-Orthodoxy”, Roman Catholicism, Eastern, Greek or Russian Orthodox, and especially ‘non-Christian’ religions. 

In the 20th Century that doctrinal distinctive of some ‘evangelicals’ began to change and widen.  Many who called themselves ‘evangelicals’ began to also question the inspiration and infallibility of the scriptures that was so central to the Reformation and Evangelicalism, to de-emphasize doctrine (which naturally follows), and to widen the definition ofChristian” and ‘brethren’ in the church. 

Whereas there had been historic (and even bloody) rejection of evangelicals by non-evangelicals and by non-Christians because of their doctrine, in later years those very evangelicals from the ‘Reformed tradition’ (Protestants) began to soften those distinctions and to try to approach and reconcile with Roman Catholicism by downplaying distinctions of doctrine and practice.  And of course the most central ‘doctrine’ is the Gospel definition and substance.

Eventually, the Ecumenical Movement formalized the re-approach to Rome and to other centers of religion.  The objective seemed to be to form some manner of ‘community’ by broadening or ignoring definitions and distinctions.  In its most extreme form, Ecumenicalism also attempts to find ‘common ground’ with even non-Christian religions. While it’s true that with other religions there is much ‘common ground’ of moral law and principles of living, there is no ‘common ground’ in the matter of the Gospel.  Along with the Reformers, Evangelicals declare that we are “not ashamed of the Gospel, which is the power of God unto salvation”, while “others preach another Gospel … and would pervert the gospel of Christ”.  The Apostle Paul had very harsh words for those that abandon or change the ‘gospel’.

Renovare & the Emergent Church has ‘emerged’ in the last 30 to 40 years as a new approach to ‘church’ which is more subjective and experience-oriented and less doctrinal and propositional.  In fact, uniquely evangelical or Christian doctrine is now de-emphasized (and in many cases ridiculed).   As a natural result, Ecumenicalism tries to bring together divergent religious groups; and ecumenicalism is inherently contained in Renovare & the Emergent Church, and now even in modern ‘liberal theology’ which long ago gave up conservative Christian ‘doctrine’.  As a consequence, the ‘Sola Fide’ Gospel has had to be softened, de-emphasized, or even abandoned as too narrow and restrictive for the new definition of “Christian”.  

As such, Ecumenicalism is an unbiblical attempt at an artificial, cobbled-together ‘Unity’ that is in name only and is not based upon Jesus’ prayer of unity of all ‘believers’.  Jesus did not emphasize His ‘common ground’ and ‘unity’ with the Jewish Pharisees and Sadducees, but rather He firmly declared the distinctions of doctrine and practice founded upon the Scriptures.  However, ecumenical writers now ignore or downplay distinctly biblical, Apostolic, Reformation, and historical Evangelicalism and the missionary calling. 

The Roman Catholic salvation ‘gospel’ is clearly declared and documented in R.C. doctrine as based upon ‘church’ membership and the ‘sacraments’, rather than the finished work of Christ and ‘sola fide’.  But Ecumenism accepts Roman Catholic doctrines and practices as mere disagreements without real importance, and focuses instead of the “common ground” of the words “Christian” and “Church” and “Mission” as if the meanings of those words don’t matter either.

The writings of their authors and proponents also emphasize ‘experience’ and minimize Christian teachings of the Bible, present a different Jesus and ‘another Gospel’ that denies, obscures, or avoids the inspiration and/or the sufficiency of scripture, the Substitutionary Atonement in contrast to the Sacraments or church membership for salvation, the necessity of being ‘born again’ as replaced by ‘The brotherhood of man’, and it welcomes all manner of belief and practice while denigrating apostolic and reformed faith if it doesn’t accept ‘other communities of faith’.   Now of course, there is ‘A brotherhood of man’ since we are all ‘creations’ of God and have ‘creative dignity’; but that is quite distinct from Christian Brotherhood which the Bible declares is based upon the one, eternal Gospel of Christ.

Ecumenicalism ignores that modern Roman Catholicism has not repudiated the doctrines and practices that were reinforced with the Council of Trent and subsequent centuries, but rather has reinforced them with modern pronouncements and emphasis.  In contrast, Protestants have downplayed Reformation beliefs in an attempt to have unity with the Roman Catholic, Eastern Orthodox, and Russian Orthodox churches (though primarily with Roman Catholicism as the dominate ‘community’).

Renovare, the Emergent Church, and Ecumenicalism in general replaces godliness and “righteousness in Christ” to focus on a ‘spirituality’ through ‘contemplative prayer’ techniques, discipline, and yes, works.

The details are very scary and ‘new age’ but with lots of big-name ‘evangelical’ supporters. 

The bottom line is that Ecumenicalism and its sisters Renovare & the Emergent Church has us heading back to the Roman Catholic Church – and forgetting the Reformation.  The “Counter-Reformation (the Council of Trent) shows just how important those distinctions are, and why the Reformation saints went to torture and death for the Biblical faith.   Renovare & Ecumenicalism have forgotten the “faith once delivered to the Saints”.  

____

"OK Ike, but doesn't all this emphasis upon the written 'Bible' ignored the Holy Spirit in our lives, and also ignore our working for the Kingdom of God right here and now?"

Bible / Spirit:
One thing to emphasize is that Jesus Himself declared the written Scriptures to be the actual “Word of God”, and He used the Scriptures extensively in His own preaching and in his refuting of the Pharisees, etc.  In fact, some of his arguments hung on just one word.    He didn’t question any of it, not even the Flood, Jonah, or the story of Adam and Eve.  Likewise, the NT is called the Word of God.  And, the authenticity and supernatural character of "God's Word" can be demonstrated 'objectively' through internal evidence, external evidence, prophecy, and 'subjectively' through the lives of the Saints.  The Holy Spirit will never contradict His Word since it is the Holy Spirit that inspired the authors of the written Word.   That is one important test of when people say that they are speaking from the spirit.  If it’s not in accordance with Scripture, then it’s very questionable – in fact, it’s error.  I have a modern day example of a ‘prophet’ in a local church whose ‘prophecy’ turned out completely opposite and wrong (the sex of an unborn child).  Likewise, people who lean on “God told me” (meaning ‘the Spirit’) have been wrong, and that’s hard to explain with the ‘error-free’ Holy Spirit living within us.

Gospel of the Kingdom:
One of the dangers of Renovare, the Emergent Church, and Liberalism is that they transfer teachings of the 'Kingdom of God' to a present day fulfillment.  Now, there is definite ‘application’ of Kingdom principles to our life (and Ministry) in this world, but the fulfillment is in Christ Himself, and the ultimate fulfillment is in the future after “The Day of the Lord”.  It’s hard to get around the OT, Matt 24 and parallel passages without destroying the scriptures.  Now, I don’t stick to any one ‘interpretation’ of when/what that Day is, but it’s definitely associated with Judgment, and not ‘progressive improvement’ of this fallen world for fulfillment.  ‘Amillenialism’ cannot be sustained by a straightforward approach to scripture.  Too much has to be ‘explained away’.   I’ll go with what Jesus taught any day!

   __________________________________________________________

 

   
Ike Sweesy
 
participant - Idaho Public TV,  Faith & Public Affairs