I agree with each of those criticisms:
1)
I
believe the Bible really is “The Word of God” (Jesus believed it, and the
scripture authors did too), and there are many demonstrations of its divine
‘inspiration’ - God reaching down to us . Renovare:
meditating on Bible words or passages affects us as we reach up to God.
2)
Emotionalism,
mysticism, and subjectivism leaves us with no authority other than ourselves and
our feelings, and so anyone’s idea or ‘feelings’ are ‘valid’ The
“meaning” of scripture is not so important as how you ‘feel’ about God,
spirituality, and others. Renovare: I feel a connection to God
and others. Man-centered.
3)
Ecumenicalism
(also many times including non-Christian religions) distorts and subtly denies
the evangelical Gospel imperative. Renovare: although it wouldn’t
be stated outright, ‘All religions can be valid’, all are the “children of
God”.
4)
You
won’t see “Systematic Theology”, or exegetical Bible Study for the
self-revelation of God which has been the foundation of Christian growth for
centuries. Instead, with Renovare: we reach out and within
through meditation and ‘worship’, and in community to find God and our
spirituality.
Remember that “Spirituality” is not
necessarily Godliness.
There are many “Renovare” references on the web now, and I found one just by
typing “Renovare MacArthur”. Similar searches yielded results
that document Renovare in many formerly strong Christian organizations.
some “anti-Renovare” sites are abusive and sarcastic
which is unfortunate, but the ‘content’ and ‘analysis’ of
those site is still very revealing.
Ike Sweesy Idaho
Public TV - Faith & Public Affairs