Legalism vs. Grace -
Ike Sweesy
If you are getting ready to do something
that you know the scripture says you shouldn't do, then please don't read the
following exposition - you'll just get angry, and anger is a sin.
The actual Biblical usage of "Legalism" is relying upon self to either attain or remain righteous.
It has nothing to do with a church (or person) holding someone
responsible for their 'unbiblical' or sinful or disobedient
behavior.
Crying "legalism" doesn't let a person off the hook. They must obey
clear biblical teaching of what is expected behavior, or call it willful
sin.
It is popular today to have comfortable definitions
of "Christianity" or of 'Christian' or 'religious' terms with
the meaning that is comfortable to us personally, and not necessarily the way
real Christianity is lived out in the Bible, or the way the 'Christian' word is
used in the scriptures. A prime example is "Legalism"
in contrast to 'Grace'. Consider this
phrase that is frequently heard, "I'm going to find a church that isn't so
"Legalistic", but that puts more emphasis upon Grace."
Translation - "you people won't let me live
the way I want to, so I'll find somewhere else to 'feel good' about myself
since I'm not going to change my behavior."
The Holy Spirit is the one that convicts a person of their
sinful behavior, and not 'self-righteous' church members who take it upon
themselves to straighten out someone. But Biblical, Godly behavior should
be taught and understood in the church, and the church is actually supposed to
hold Christians accountable for their sinful behavior.
The actual Biblical usage of "Legalism" is relying upon self to either attain or remain
'righteous'. It has nothing to do with a church (or person) holding
someone responsible for their 'unbiblical' behavior. Crying
"legalism" doesn't let a person off the hook to obey clear biblical
teaching of expected behavior.
It is the 'false righteousness', or 'self-righteous' behavior of the
Pharisees that Jesus was pointing out in His encounters with them. The
Pharisees thought that by their strict adherence to "the traditions of
the fathers" that made them attain 'righteousness'.
In fact, the believer's righteousness is given to us "by
Grace, through Faith", not by our good deeds or the "do's and
don'ts". That gift is also how the Apostle Paul contrasted 'Grace'
& 'Legalism' to the Galatian & Ephesian Christians - righteousness
comes by Grace. And then after Grace, and by Grace, we turn our lives
over to God to live according to His Word. But we cannot confuse obedience with legalism.
Jesus didnt and Paul didnt.
Obedience to God's Word because we've received God's Grace, in
contrast to 'legalism' to attain righteousness, is commanded and even
expected by Jesus ("if you love me you will keep my
commandments"; Please read all of John 14:21-24). Likewise, we are commanded to obey
throughout both the Old and New Testaments. It is not the Law, but rather
obedience in our love of the Lord which Jesus teaches in that passage. The
whole world, saved and unsaved, is accountable to God for their obedience or disobedience.
Even the unsaved have His law written upon their hearts, and are accountable
for it. How much more a Christian who has the Holy Spirit dwelling within?
While
Legalism is applying human works to attain righteousness in order
to be pleasing to God,
Obedience is in the power of the Holy Spirit, and is the proper and
pure behavior described in the Bible. And it is in
loving response to Gods goodness.
... you can count on them to offhandedly refer to the 'Red
Herring' of Legalism to distract you
When talking to someone who is getting ready to do what they want even though
they know that the scriptures teach the opposite, you can count on them to
offhandedly refer to "Legalism". But of course, they are missing
the real meaning of 'legalism', but in terms of 'logical fallacies' they are
creating a "Straw Man" or a "Red Herring" to distract
you. They equate the requirement for obedience in a matter addressed in
Scripture with the common (popular) definition of "Legalism".
Their assumption is that "we all know that Jesus condemned
legalism". Hence, they can do what they want.
Grace and Forgiveness
In the Old Testament and New Testament God's grace, mercy, and forgiveness is
offered to those who have sinned. Probably the most sensitive issue
today is Divorce & Remarriage. Those who have divorced
illegitimately cannot claim "Legalism" to negate Biblical principles, nor the
clear, straightforward (and unqualified)
statements of Jesus. Jesus ministering grace and his forgiveness of the woman
taken in adultery ("neither do I condemn thee") cannot be taken as a
contradiction to what he said Himself about marriage, divorce, and adultery.
Jesus was not
being legalistic in Matthew but then gracious in John - He does not
contradict Himself. Neither does
forgiveness contradict Jesus own statements on marriage and divorce. Gods
grace, mercy, and forgiveness are reflected throughout scripture, both Old and New
Testament, and there is no condemnation to those who are in Christ Jesus. We
see multitudes of sinners and righteous alike flock to Jesus, and he taught them. Some of
that teaching was difficult, even for the disciples, but he declared all that the Father
had given him to say. Does that mean that those who have divorced and remarried
illegitimately are without forgiveness. In no way. But there are consequences.
Compare Davids sin and forgiveness. But the forgiveness does not imply that further
willful transgression is acceptable, and is to be overlooked. "Shall we sin that grace may
abound?"
Grace, Truth, and Love
Jesus is full of Grace and Truth, and they do not contradict. Likewise, the
full counsel of God does not make us choose to obey one and minimize or
explain away the other. Jesus loved the rich young ruler, but he gave him a
straightforward statement that couldnt be misunderstood. "Go sell all that you
own and come follow me." That young man fully understood, and it was too hard for
him. He didn't accuse Jesus of being "Legalistic" in what He expected
of that rich young man.
Ministry
I believe that Jesus demonstrated how to deal with real people in his ministry of grace,
and with his teaching of truth. He never contradicted either. Likewise, Jesus used the
Word as truth texts to minister grace to the hearers. Sometimes
that grace was convicting, encouraging, correcting, or teaching (how to live). But,
sometimes, for some it was too hard to accept. 1 Timothy 3:16 gives the whole range of
applications of inspired scripture - some is for 'reproof', and some is for
'instruction in righteousness'. All is binding on God's children.
Leadership and Ministry is difficult, and finding the truth to obey sometimes seems
to be difficult, but I truly believe that God hasnt made important principles of
life hard to understand. They are merely difficult and painful to apply. Loving someone is
wanting the best for them, and the best for them can never be contradictory to Gods
revealed will. God has declared His love for us, and has called us to obedience of his
Word. Even Jesus learned obedience by the things which he suffered (Heb.
5:8,9). This is a painful issue, but we are called to discern "Grace, Obedience,
Legalism, Phariseeism, Love, Ministering, Forgiveness, and Truth". These must be
defined by scripture and not common Christian usage, and we understand that "He has
given us all things that pertain to life and godliness" (2 Peter 1:3). Relying upon
the sufficiency of scripture for faith and practice is not legalism, but orthodoxy.
May God give us wisdom in understanding His Word, and also give us His
grace to obey exactly what he reveals to us through His word. "Thy Word is
Truth"
-
Ike Sweesy